Spatial change in manufacturing employment patterns as a result of deindustrialization
|
Show Recommended textbook solutions
The Language of Composition: Reading, Writing, Rhetoric2nd EditionLawrence Scanlon, Renee H. Shea, Robin Dissin Aufses 661 solutions
 Technical Writing for Success3rd EditionDarlene Smith-Worthington, Sue Jefferson 468 solutions
Literature and Composition: Reading, Writing,Thinking1st EditionCarol Jago, Lawrence Scanlon, Renee H. Shea, Robin Dissin Aufses 1,697 solutions
Technical Writing for Success3rd EditionDarlene Smith-Worthington, Sue Jefferson 468 solutions Deindustrialization affects the economic landscape of countries.A.Describe the change in the dominant economic sector during industrialization and duringdeindustrialization. Get answer to your question and much more B.Explain ONE spatial change in manufacturing employment patterns as a result ofdeindustrialization. Get answer to your question and much more C.Explain ONE likely outcome of deindustrialization in a region of manufacturingcommunities. Get answer to your question and much more Abstract Deindustrialisation is typically conceptualised as a decline in manufacturing as a share of total employment. From a Kaldorian perspective deindustrialisation could have negative implications for long-run growth, given the special growth-pulling properties of manufacturing. However, defining deindustrialisation purely in terms of employment share is conceptually limiting given that some of the Kaldorian processes operate primarily through output rather than employment, as well as blunting empirical analysis by not focussing enough on changes in manufacturing share of gross domestic product (GDP). This study develops a new method using decomposition techniques to analyse changes in manufacturing employment levels and shares in 48 countries over periods of 'deindustrialisation'. The analysis separates out changes in the levels and shares of employment manufacturing into components associated with changes in the share of manufacturing in GDP, the growth of manufacturing value-added, the labour intensity of manufacturing production and economic growth. The results indicate that in most cases the decline in manufacturing employment is associated primarily with falling labour intensity of manufacturing rather than an overall decline in the size or share of the manufacturing sector. We suggest that deindustrialisation should appropriately be defined in terms of a sustained decline in both the share of manufacturing in total employment and the share of manufacturing in GDP. Journal Information The Cambridge Journal of Economics, founded in 1977 in the traditions of Marx, Keynes, Kalecki, Joan Robinson and Kaldor, provides a forum for theoretical, applied, policy and methodological research into social and economic issues. Publisher Information Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. OUP is the world's largest university press with the widest global presence. It currently publishes more than 6,000 new publications a year, has offices in around fifty countries, and employs more than 5,500 people worldwide. It has become familiar to millions through a diverse publishing program that includes scholarly works in all academic disciplines, bibles, music, school and college textbooks, business books, dictionaries and reference books, and academic journals. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. What are the effects of deindustrialization?Deindustrialization and job cuts often lead to long periods of unemployment, intermittent employment and increased underemployment, and the effects transcend simply the loss of pay, medical benefits and purchasing power.
What is one likely outcome of deindustrialization in a region of manufacturing communities?Deindustrialization causes the economic capital for manufacturing within a particular region to be lost to other parts of a country or to other countries. The effects of deindustrialization, however, are typically regional, and can lead to a loss in the economic vibrancy and cultural pride within a region.
What was a major effect of deindustrialization on industry itself?During deindustrialization, the declining share of employment in manufacturing appears to mirror a decline in the share of manufacturing value added in GDP.
What are the main causes of deindustrialization?The main reason for deindustrialization is the faster growth of productivity in manufacturing than in services. North-South trade has played very little role in deindustrialization.
|
