Sample size for cross sectional study
|
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance. Show p: The prevalence of the condition/ health state. If the prevalence is 32%, it may be either used as such (32%), or in its decimal form (0.32). q: i. When p is in percentage terms: (100-p) ii. When p is in decimal terms: (1-p) d (or l): The precision of the estimate. This could either be the relative precision, or the absolute precision. This will be discussed later in this post. Za [Z alpha]: The value of z from the probability tables. If the values are normally distributed, then 95% of the values will fall within 2 standard errors of the mean. The value of z corresponding to this is 1.96 (from the standard normal variate tables). The formula for estimating sample size is given as: (Za)^2[p*q] where the symbol ^ means ‘to the power of’; * means ‘multiplied by’ N= d^2 that is, “Z-alpha squared into pq; upon d-square” substituting the values of Za, we get: N= (1.96)^2[p*q] d^2 We can round off the value of Za (1.96) to 2, to obtain: N= (2)^2[p*q] d^2 or, N= 4pq/ d^2 that is, “4 pq by d-square”
Example: I wish to conduct a cross-sectional study on awareness of Hepatitis B among school children. A literature search reveals that other investigators have reported knowledge to range from 5% to 20% among students of grades 6 through 8. What should the size of my sample be?
The formula requires us to input the value of d (precision). If the absolute precision is known, there is no problem. However, often we can only input a relative precision. Where do we get the value of relative precision from? Typically, relative precision is taken as a proportion of ‘p’. The maximum permissible limit is 20% of ‘p’. In the above example, if ‘p’ is 20%, then ‘d’ will be (20/100)*20= 0.2*20= 4 {Taking a relative precision of 20%}. This means that we will be able to detect a ‘p’ (prevalence) of 18% or more {half the value of relative precision on either side of ‘p’–> +/- 2%: 18% to 22%}. That is, by taking a relative precision of 20% of ‘p’, the study will be able to detect the true awareness level if the actual prevalence is 18% or more. If the actual prevalence is less than 18%, however, the study will be unable to detect it accurately. Therefore, the larger the value of ‘p’ (prevalence), the larger the possible value of ‘d’ (relative precision), keeping ‘d’ fixed (say, at 20% of ‘p’). If the prevalence is 50%, ‘d’ (20% of ‘p’) would then be 0.2*50= 10 (as compared to ‘d’ = 4 when ‘p’ = 20%). The reverse is also true: the smaller the value of ‘p’, the smaller the value of ‘d’. A smaller ‘d’ implies a larger sample size. Therefore, the choice of ‘p’ is crucial. We can now input the values in the formula to obtain the sample size: For the calculation we will take ‘d’ as 4. This yields: N= (4*20*80)/ (4*4) = 400 this sample size will enable us to detect the truth if the prevalence is between 18-22% (or more). If we took ‘p’= 5, then the sample size would be: N= (4*5*95)/(1*1) [‘d’= 0.2*5= 1] = 1900 this sample size will enable us to detect the truth if the prevalence is between 4-6% (or more). So should I take ‘p’= 20% or ‘p’=5%? That depends upon: 1. The location of the original study- if you are planning to conduct the study in an urban area, use the prevalence reported by studies conducted in urban areas, and vice versa. 2. The available resources (time, manpower, money, etc.). Aim for the largest feasible sample size. The size should be adequate to yield 80% power. Do not unnecessarily increase the sample size unless the intention is to obtain greater power. If so, please mention the same in the methodology section. 3. The results of your pilot study. If you have conducted a pilot study, the prevalence obtained from that study should be taken as ‘p’. This will be much more accurate than any other external value.
Note 1: If you have multiple objectives, you must calculate the required sample size for each objective, then choose the largest sample size thus obtained. This will ensure adequate power for all objectives, else the study will lack power for one or more objectives. That is, you may not be able to detect a significant result where it actually exists because you failed to include enough subjects to detect it. Note 2: It is advisable to mention a range rather than a single value for sample size. This is standard practice in the west, but not in India. A range may be obtained by calculating the sample size for different values of ‘p’. What type of sampling is used in cross sectional study?Simple random sampling
A sample is taken in such a way that each combination of individuals in the population has an equal chance of being selected.
How to calculate sample size for comparative cross sectional study?If your samples are independents and equal in size and the two populations have the same variance, alpha is 0.05, power 0.80, and your effect size is medium, I would suggest an approximative but simple formulat: 16/d², which gives 64 for each sample.
What is an acceptable sample size for a study?A good maximum sample size is usually 10% as long as it does not exceed 1000. A good maximum sample size is usually around 10% of the population, as long as this does not exceed 1000. For example, in a population of 5000, 10% would be 500. In a population of 200,000, 10% would be 20,000.
Is 30 an acceptable sample size?A sample size of 30 is fairly common across statistics. A sample size of 30 often increases the confidence interval of your population data set enough to warrant assertions against your findings. 4 The higher your sample size, the more likely the sample will be representative of your population set.
|
