Nhiều ng bảo i3 10105F cũng ngon k kém có đúng k khi đặt cạnh 2 con i5 trên ạ
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Comparing Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400F processor market type [desktop or notebook], architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance rating | 465 | 318 |
| Value for money | 68.85 | 82.80 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake | Rocket Lake |
| Release date | 30 April 2020 [1 year ago] | 16 March 2021 [1 year ago] |
| Launch price [MSRP] | $155 | $157 |
| Price now | $138 [0.9x MSRP] | $165 [1.1x MSRP] |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
Technical specs
Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 [Hexa-Core] | 6 [Hexa-Core] |
| Threads | 12 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K [per core] | 64K [per core] |
| L2 cache | 256K [per core] | 256K [per core] |
| L3 cache | 12 MB [shared] | 12 MB [shared] |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature [TCase] | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard [look for socket type], power supply unit [look for power consumption] etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1200 |
| Thermal design power [TDP] | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | - | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep [EIST] | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| SIPP | - | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | + |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400F. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400F.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- wPrime 32
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD [720p] video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core [sometimes called Multi-Thread] is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench R15 [standing for Release 15] is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version [sometimes called Single-Thread] only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Let's see how good Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400F are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately. Also, your gaming PC must have a decent enough GPU to perform well.
| Performance rating | 11.97 | 15.91 |
| Novelty | 30 April 2020 | 16 March 2021 |
| Cost | $155 | $157 |
| Boost clock speed | 4300 | 4400 |
| Base clock speed | 2900 | 2600 |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
Intel Core i5-11400F
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
Here you can ask a question about Core i5-10400F or Core i5-11400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.