So sánh gtx 1060 và gtx 960 năm 2024
|
Nvidia thời gian vừa qua trình làng công nghệ 2 dòng sản phẩm mới trong phân khúc card đồ họa giá rẻ nhằm đem đến người dùng nhiều sản phẩm chất lượng hơn đó chính là GTX 1650 Super và GTX 1060. Hãy cùng Vi Tính Hoàng Long so sánh tìm hiểu 2 GPU này nhé. Show
BẢNG SO SÁNH THÔNG SỐ KỸ THUẬT CỦA GTX 1650 SUPER VỚI GTX 1060GTX 1650 SUPER GTX 1060 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Năm sản xuất 2019 2016 Nhiệt độ tối đa ghi 66C 76C Max fan tiếng ồn 46dB 47.1dB Đề nghị Power Supply 470W 470W Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz ($369.89) Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz ($334.99) CPU code name TU116 GP106 Thiết đặt chất lượng chuẩn Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings Hiệu suất trung bình 1080p 73.2 FPS 67.0 FPS Trung bình 1440p hiệu suất 53.8 FPS 48.4 FPS VRAM 4 GB GDDR6 6 GB GDDR5 Memory bus width 128 bit 192 bit Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 8000 MHz Architecture Turning Pascal CUDA Cores 1280 CUDA Cores 1280 CUDA Cores Die sizes 284 mm^2 200 mm^2 Base Clock 1530 MHz 1506 MHz Boost Clock 1725 MHz 1708 MHz Number of transistors 6,600 million 4,400 million Texture fill rate 138 136.7 Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 192.2 GB/s GTX 1650 SUPERGTX 1650 SUPER là cải tiến lớn nhất so với dòng tiền nhiệm GTX 1660, GTX 1650 thường đó là sự nâng cấp chuẩn VRAM lên DDR6 tăng tốc độ truyền tải băng thông bộ nhớ nhằm cải thiện hiệu năng giải mã đồ họa đối với các nền tảng phổ biến hiện nay. GTX 1650 SUPER có phần linh kiện giữ nguyên là TU116. TU116 được sản xuất trên quy trình 12nm FFN (FinFET Nvidia) của TSMC, bao gồm 6,6 tỷ bóng bán dẫn . GTX 1650 Super mang lại 1.280 nhân Cuda. Bộ nhớ mới nằm trên cùng một bus 128 bit, sử dụng bốn bộ điều khiển bộ nhớ 32 bit. Bản cập nhật này cải thiện đáng kể băng thông bộ nhớ từ 128 GB/s lên 192 GB/s. Dung lượng bộ nhớ vẫn giữ nguyên ở mức 4GB, mà ngày nay có thể là mối quan tâm đối với một số tựa game có mức đồ họa cao. VRAM thấp có thể ảnh hưởng đáng kể đến hiệu suất trò chơi, vì vậy người dùng nên cân nhắc trước khi mua sản phẩm này. GTX 1650 Super gần như xoay sở giữ mức khoảng 60 FPS trong tất cả các game ở 1080p medium (trừ Metro Exodus). Nhưng lên độ phân giải 1080p ultra thì mặc dù FPS trung bình là 60 nhưng hơn nửa phân cảnh FPS bị drop xuống mức 40 đến 55. GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1060 sử dụng nhân đồ họa GP106 có kích cỡ chân đế là 200mm^2. Trên chiếc GTX 1060, GP106 được sử dụng sẽ là bản đầy đủ tính năng.Nhân đồ họa GP106 sẽ có tổng cộng 4,4 tỉ transistors. Kiến trúc GP106-400-A1 gồm 2 GPC (Graphics Processing Clusters). Mỗi GPC sẽ bao gồm 5 SM (Streaming Multiprocessor). Mỗi SM sẽ có 128 nhân CUDA, mang lại tổng số 1280 nhân CUDA trên chiếc chip đồ họa. GP106 cũng sẽ có 6 vi xử lý bộ nhớ, mang lại băng thông bộ nhớ 192-bit. Điều này cũng giúp cho GTX 1060 có thể sở hữu VRAM 6GB. VRAM của GTX 1060 sẽ có xung nhịp bộ nhớ lên đến 8000 MHz, cao nhất có thể trên GDDR5. Với một chiếc card đồ họa phổ thông, không nên quá trông mong sự xuất hiện của GDDR5X. Tuy nhiên, hiệu suất chơi game khá ấn tượng. GTX 1060 6GB luôn cung cấp tốc độ khung hình tuyệt vời tăng so với GTX 960 và nó thực sự chứng minh sự nâng cấp. Đối với 1080p Full HD, có thể chơi tại 61 FPS đến 68 FPS và giữ tốc độ khung hình lơ lửng xung quanh 65 FPS. Đối với 1440p, GTX 1060 nằm ở mức 48.8 FPS. Với hệ thống dẫn điện có trở kháng thấp và ổn áp được thiết kế riêng, GTX 1060 sẽ có điện áp rất ổn định. Với thiết kế điện áp tốt, GTX 1060 sở hữu tiềm năng ép xung rất lớn, tương tự như những “người anh em” sử dụng GP104 của mình. Các bài thử nội bộ của Nvidia đã cho thấy ép xung lên 2GHz là điều bình thường với bất cứ chiếc GTX 1060 nào. GTX 1650 SUPER VÀ GTX 1060 NÊN MUA CÁI NÀO?Theo những dữ liệu đã biết ở trên thì rõ ràng GTX 1650 SUPER không thực sự quá vượt trội so với GTX 1060. Nếu dùng để chơi game thì bạn vẫn có thể sử dụng GTX 1650 SUPER, nhưng Vi tính Hoàng Long vẫn khuyên bạn chọn 1060 với hiệu suất chơi game ấn tượng và tốc độ khung hình tốt hơn. Sau bài trên, lựa chọn của bạn sẽ là gì hãy cho chúng tôi biết với nhé. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores12801024CUDA coresno data1024Core clock speed1506 MHz1127 MHzBoost clock speed1708 MHz1178 MHzNumber of transistors4,400 million2,940 millionManufacturing process technology16 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)120 Watt120 WattTexture fill rate136.772 billion/secFloating-point performance4,375 gflops2,413 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length250 mm9.5" (24.1 cm)Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)Width2-slot2-slotRecommended system power (PSU)no data400 WattSupplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pinsSLI optionsno data+ MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GBMemory bus width192 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed8000 MHz7.0 GB/sMemory bandwidth192.2 GB/s112 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2Multi monitor supportno data4 displaysHDMI++HDCPno data+Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536G-SYNC support++Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. GameStreamno data+GeForce ShadowPlayno data+GPU Boostno data2.0GameWorksno data+VR Ready+no data API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)Shader Model6.46.4OpenGL4.64.4OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.2.131+CUDA6.1+ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GTX 1060 6 GB 26.44 +69.2% 1060 6 GB outperforms 960 by 69% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% GTX 1060 6 GB 10252 +69.1% 1060 6 GB outperforms 960 by 69% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% GTX 1060 6 GB 55893 +81.8% 1060 6 GB outperforms 960 by 82% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% GTX 1060 6 GB 17401 +61.6% 1060 6 GB outperforms 960 by 62% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% 1060 6 GB outperforms 960 by 64% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 1060 6 GB 77035 +54.3% 1060 6 GB outperforms 960 by 54% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% GTX 1060 6 GB 437988 +40.9% 1060 6 GB outperforms 960 by 41% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD92 65 1440p49 27−30 4K32 29 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207740−45 24−27 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey72 +125% 30−35 −125% Assassin's Creed Valhalla45−50 +74.1% 27−30 −74.1% Battlefield 5106 +100% 50−55 −100% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare78 +95% 40−45 −95% Cyberpunk 207740−45 +83.3% 24−27 −83.3% Far Cry 582 +100% 40−45 −100% Far Cry New Dawn81 +88.4% 40−45 −88.4% Forza Horizon 4100 +85.2% 50−55 −85.2% Hitman 380−85 +84.1% 40−45 −84.1% Horizon Zero Dawn55−60 +72.7% 30−35 −72.7% Red Dead Redemption 256 +115% 24−27 −115% Shadow of the Tomb Raider68 +106% 30−35 −106% Watch Dogs: Legion50−55 +75.9% 27−30 −75.9% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey61 +90.6% 30−35 −90.6% Assassin's Creed Valhalla45−50 +74.1% 27−30 −74.1% Battlefield 586 +62.3% 50−55 −62.3% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare64 +60% 40−45 −60% Cyberpunk 207740−45 +83.3% 24−27 −83.3% Far Cry 575 +82.9% 40−45 −82.9% Far Cry New Dawn75 +74.4% 40−45 −74.4% Forza Horizon 493 +72.2% 50−55 −72.2% Hitman 380−85 +84.1% 40−45 −84.1% Horizon Zero Dawn55−60 +72.7% 30−35 −72.7% Metro Exodus43 +79.2% 24−27 −79.2% Red Dead Redemption 230 +15.4% 24−27 −15.4% Shadow of the Tomb Raider58 +75.8% 30−35 −75.8% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt76 +52% 50 −52% Watch Dogs: Legion50−55 +75.9% 27−30 −75.9% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey38 +18.8% 30−35 −18.8% Assassin's Creed Valhalla45−50 +74.1% 27−30 −74.1% Battlefield 578 +47.2% 50−55 −47.2% Cyberpunk 207740−45 +83.3% 24−27 −83.3% Far Cry 570 +70.7% 40−45 −70.7% Far Cry New Dawn69 +60.5% 40−45 −60.5% Forza Horizon 473 +35.2% 50−55 −35.2% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt44 +57.1% 28 −57.1% Watch Dogs: Legion50−55 +75.9% 27−30 −75.9% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare41 +78.3% 21−24 −78.3% Hitman 345−50 +80% 24−27 −80% Horizon Zero Dawn35−40 +71.4% 21−24 −71.4% Metro Exodus26 +85.7% 14−16 −85.7% Red Dead Redemption 219 +72.7% 10−12 −72.7% Shadow of the Tomb Raider34 +70% 20−22 −70% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey32 +100% 16−18 −100% Assassin's Creed Valhalla27−30 +108% 12−14 −108% Battlefield 558 +75.8% 30−35 −75.8% Cyberpunk 207716−18 +113% 8−9 −113% Far Cry 547 +80.8% 24−27 −80.8% Far Cry New Dawn50 +72.4% 27−30 −72.4% Forza Horizon 457 +90% 30−33 −90% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt35−40 +94.7% 18−20 −94.7% Watch Dogs: Legion21−24 +110% 10−11 −110% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare22 +100% 10−12 −100% Hitman 324−27 +78.6% 14−16 −78.6% Horizon Zero Dawn18−20 +63.6% 10−12 −63.6% Metro Exodus16 +100% 8−9 −100% Red Dead Redemption 212 +50% 8−9 −50% Shadow of the Tomb Raider17 +70% 10−11 −70% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt29 +93.3% 14−16 −93.3% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey18 +100% 9−10 −100% Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16 +114% 7−8 −114% Battlefield 531 +82.4% 16−18 −82.4% Cyberpunk 20777−8 +133% 3−4 −133% Far Cry 523 +91.7% 12−14 −91.7% Far Cry New Dawn26 +73.3% 14−16 −73.3% Forza Horizon 438 +90% 20−22 −90% Watch Dogs: Legion12−14 +100% 6−7 −100% This is how GTX 1060 6 GB and GTX 960 compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 26.44 15.63 Recency 19 July 2016 22 January 2015 Cost $299 $199 Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB Memory bus width 192 128 Pipelines / CUDA cores 1280 1024 Memory bandwidth 192.2 112 Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 960 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 960 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
