How did the displacement of native peoples in Australia differ from the experience of Indians in the American West?
|
journal article Show
Journal of American Ethnic History Vol. 33, No. 3 (Spring 2014) , pp. 55-76 (22 pages) Published By: University of Illinois Press https://doi.org/10.5406/jamerethnhist.33.3.0055 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/jamerethnhist.33.3.0055 Read and download Log in through your school or library Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $18.00 USD. How does it work?
Journal Information Journal of American Ethnic History addresses various aspects of American immigration and ethnic history, including background of emigration, ethnic and racial groups, Native Americans, immigration policies, and the processes of acculturation. Each issue contains articles, review essays and single book reviews. There are also occasional sections on "Research Comments" (short articles that furnish important information for the field, a guide to further research or other significant historical items that will stimulate discussion and inquiry) and "Teaching and Outreach" (essays which focus on innovative teaching methods or outreach efforts). The journal has also published special issues on particular responses from authors on specific topics. Publisher Information The University of Illinois Press is one of the leading publishers of humanities and social sciences journals in the country. Founded in 1918, the Press publishes more than 40 journals representing 18 societies, along with more than 100 new books annually. Our publication program covers a wide range of disciplines including psychology, philosophy, Black studies, women's studies, cultural studies, music, immigration, and more. Current issues are available through the Scholarly Publishing Collective. The Press is a founding member of the Association of University Presses. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. journal article Nineteenth-Century Canada and Australia: The Paradoxes of Class FormationLabour History No. 71, Australia and Canada: Labour Compared (Nov., 1996) , pp. 16-36 (21 pages) Published By: Liverpool University Press https://doi.org/10.2307/27516447 https://www.jstor.org/stable/27516447 Read and download Log in through your school or library Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Abstract THIS SPECULATIVE ESSAY presents a preliminary statement on the paradoxical character of 19th-century class formation in the two white settler dominions of Canada and Australia. Outposts of empire, these social formations were early regarded with disdain, the one a classic mercantilist harvester of fish, fur, and wood, the other a dumping ground for convicts. By the mid-to-late 19th-century, however, Canada and Australia were the richest of colonies. Within their distinctive cultures and political economies, both supposedly dominated by staples, emerged working classes that were simultaneously combatative and accommodated. By the 1880s impressive organizational gains had been registered by labour in both countries, but the achievements of class were conditioned by particular relations of fragmentation, including those of 'race' and gender. Journal Information Labour History, which has been appearing twice yearly since 1962, is the premier outlet for refereed, scholarly articles in the fields of social and labour history in Australasia. The interdisciplinary nature of labour history, and its acceptance of less traditional sources, including folklore and oral testimony, make it a fascinating field, alive to past and present social justice issues. Labour History also publishes essays, reviews, and memoirs that reflect the involvement of labour historians in the making of history. It examines issues such as labour politics, trade unions, management labour practices, co-operatives, gender and ethnicity. Subscribers receive the printed edition and have the benefits of a digital edition as well. Publisher Information Liverpool University Press (LUP) is the UK’s third oldest university press, with a distinguished history of publishing exceptional research since 1899, including the work of Nobel prize winners. LUP has rapidly expanded in recent years and now publishes approximately 100 books and 33 journals a year, specialising in literature, modern languages, history and visual culture. LUP won both IPG Academic and Professional Publisher of the Year and the Bookseller Industry Awards Independent Academic, Educational & Professional Publisher of the Year in 2015. "Liverpool University Press is one of the great success stories in the difficult climate of modern academic publishing." --Professor Sir Jonathan Bate Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. What did Native Americans have in common with Zulu of South Africa and the Aboriginal people in Australia?What did Native Americans have in common with the Zulu of South Africa and the aboriginal people in Australia? They found themselves pushed aside by centralizing government trying to control large interior regions.
Which of the following statements describes settlement and development of the American West most accurately?Which of the following statements describes settlement and development of the American West most accurately? The federal government actively acquired Indian territories, distributed land to companies, and helped to open large areas to commercial farming.
Which of the following best describes the reason why we know so little about most Native American tribes?Which of the following best describes the reason why we know so little about most Native American tribes? We don't have much written evidence of their history and culture.
Why was the Hollywood version of the western cowboy based more on fantasy than reality?Why was the Hollywood version of the western "cowboy" based more on fantasy than reality? Most cowboys were low-paid workers, some of whom even went on strike for higher wages. The impact of the second industrial revolution on the trans-Mississippi West was: dramatic as an agricultural empire grew.
|
