What is the significance of screening scanning in musculoskeletal evaluation?

This examination was devised for use in routine clinical assessment and takes 1–2 minutes to perform. It involves inspecting carefully for joint swelling and abnormal posture, as well as assessing the joints for normal movement.

If an abnormality of an individual area is noted in the GALS screen, that area should be examined in more detail using the relevant regional examination routine [REMS]. The GALS screen is not designed to tell you what the problem is, only that there is a problem that requires further assessment.

The sequence in which these four elements [Gait, Arms, Legs and Spine] are assessed can be varied – in practice, it is usually more convenient to complete the elements for which the patient is standing before asking the patient to lie onto the couch.

Introduction

It is important to introduce yourself, explain to the patient what you are going to do, gain verbal consent to examine, and ask the patient to let you know if you cause them any pain or discomfort at any time. In all cases it is important to make the patient feel comfortable about being examined and this extends to the clothing they wear and level of exposure.

A good musculoskeletal examination relies on patient cooperation, in order for them to relax their muscles, but also the ability to view and compare joints and muscle groups if important clinical signs are not to be missed.

Screening is a valuable process for athletes and is commonly practised in several elite sports. One of the common elements of a periodic medical assessment of athletes, is the musculoskeletal screening or examination. For many years, physiotherapists have screened athletes with the aim of identifying the athletes at risk for injury, so that they can then implement injury prevention programmes for these athletes. More recently, the focus has, however, shifted from using screening to predict injuries to rather using screening to identify possible predispositions to injury.

Reasons for the Periodic Medical Assessment of Athletes[edit | edit source]

The main reason for the periodic medical assessment of athletes is to safeguard sports participation, but there are many other additional benefits, including:[1]

  • Identification of medical conditions that contraindicate sports participation
  • Assessment of known injuries and illnesses
  • Review of current medications and supplements
  • Athlete education
  • Baseline testing
  • Developing rapport with the athlete
  • Specific screening
    • Cardiac screening
    • Screening for unknown illnesses
    • Screening for risk factors for future injury

Read more: Screening in sport and Pre-participation Screening

Injury rates in sports are increasing despite the increased professionalism of sports science and the use of sports medicine support teams. Although participation in sport is encouraged as part of a healthy lifestyle, the sport-related injury burden is high.[2]

Consequences of Injuries in Sport[edit | edit source]

  • Financial implications for the club
    • The cost of player injuries on sports leagues and organisations mainly fall into two categories: the direct medical costs and the opportunity cost of time loss injuries and shortened careers. This has led to professional teams offering players contracts contingent upon medical evaluations - players with high injury risk may then be offered short-term contracts.[3]
  • Team performance
    • A significant relationship between injury rates and time-loss with performance in elite team sports is reported.[4]
  • Financial implications for the healthcare system
    • Finch et al[5] investigated the trends and burdens of hospital-treated sports injuries in Australia and estimated the direct cost of sport-related injury over 7 years to be $265 million Australian dollars.[5]
  • Financial costs for the individual
    • The inability to perform has a significant impact on an athlete’s earnings. Secrist et al[6] showed that players in the National Football League with an ACL injury earned on average $2,070,521 less than salary-matched controls over the 4 years after the injury.
  • Implications for long term health
    • It has been shown that knee injuries such as ACL or meniscal injury increase the odds of subsequently developing knee OA[7]
  • Career progression in sports
    • Larukain et al[8] demonstrated a negative association between injuries and player progression in an elite football academy with players that progressed to the next level having a lower injury burden and higher match availability compared to players that did not progress.[8]

Can we predict injuries? In literature, there is the issue of prediction or association. Most of the available literature looks at retrospective studies where an association between a certain physical factor and an injury is seen, as opposed to using a certain physical factor in a retrospective manner to investigate if it can actually predict an injury.[9]

In recent years, much of the literature on screening tests suggests that these tests are not able to predict which athlete will sustain an injury, so clinicians are moving away from this idea.[10] However, this does not mean that screening should not be performed, as "screening remains essential in our efforts to protect athletes’ health."[11] The following video provides a good explanation on injury risk and screening.

[12]

An infographic explaining prediction versus association in sports injuries can be found here.

Factors Involved in the Development of Injuries[edit | edit source]

There are various factors that play a role in the risk of injury occurrence, and these factors can interact with each other:[13]

  • Training-related factors
    • Training volume, load, intensity
    • Type of training
    • Training and competition schedule
    • Rest
  • Psychological factors
    • Beliefs
    • Fears
    • Coping strategies
    • Self-efficacy
    • Catastrophising
    • Emotional status [stress, depression, anxiety]
  • Environmental factors
    • Training/competition surface
    • Equipment
    • Clothing
    • Weather
    • Coaching
  • Additional demands
    • Home
    • Work
    • Family
    • Social
    • Leadership
    • Media
    • Sponsors
  • Other factors
    • Sport specific skill level
    • Ranking and status
    • Goals of athlete – short- and long-term

When considering injury screening, it is important to consider the myriad of factors that can influence injury occurrence. Furthermore, it is unlikely that these can be reduced to a single factor that may lead to injury.[13] Factors that are commonly screened for in musculoskeletal injury risk screening are:

  • Strength and conditioning
  • Movement quality
  • Stability/alignment

From the map by Bolling et al[14] it is evident that these factors are just a few of the many factors that can be involved in injury occurrence.[14]

A multilevel system map with factors, strategies and stakeholders in relation to injury and its prevention. Starting at the centre of the map [ie, the athlete] and moving outwards; [A] entails artist-related intrinsic injury factors; [B] presents external injury factors; [C] describes the main preventive strategies [eg, load management, safety and preparation] which are driven by the factors from the inner two circles; [D] represents the stakeholders in the system as well as how they connect to the strategies and factors across the multiple levels.[14]

Instead of trying to predict injury occurrence, it may be more appropriate to identify athletes who are predisposed and where possible modify the predisposition.

  • Non-modifiable predispositions include:
    • Anatomy
    • Genetics
    • Previous injury
    • Environmental factors
  • Modifiable predispositions include:
    • Strength
    • Movement
    • Skill
    • Flexibility
    • State of the athlete e.g. tired or stressed?

This flow diagram created by Dr Lee Herrington illustrates how predispositions and exposure to load can lead to vulnerability in an athlete and, in combination with an inciting event, can lead to injury mechanisms and occurrences.

Considerations in Identifying Predisposed Athletes[edit | edit source]

  • Understand the nature of the sport and the injuries occurring
    • Common injuries vs catastrophic injuries [for example hamstring injuries vs ACL injuries soccer]
  • Identify which injury needs to be targeted as this will determine what type of screening tests will be used
  • Do these specific injuries have modifiable factors?
  • Are there clearly definable physical qualities related to the injury? Can these modifiable factors be clearly defined in terms of certain physical qualities?
  • Can these physical qualities be identified with reliable screening tests?
  • Can these physical qualities be influenced, modified or changed? [For example – blue eyes may be a predisposing factor to a certain type of injury and can easily and reliably be screened for, but eye colour cannot be changed, modified or influenced.]
  • Traumatic injuries in the sport – how influenceable are traumatic injuries through screening and training?

Screening for Neuromuscular Control of Movement[edit | edit source]

Neuromuscular control is the ability to perform a movement in the best possible way to minimise loading stress or maximise the distribution of loading stresses on the tissue involved.[13] An important part of “movement screening” is to identify the high-risk movement tasks and determine if these tasks can be broken down into closed skills.  A closed skill is undertaken in a controlled environment where the athlete only focuses on that specific skill [e.g. single leg squat or single-leg landing].[13] An open skill is undertaken in a very chaotic and random environment [e.g. single-leg landing in the middle of a sporting environment such as competition or match]. The context in which these movements take pace will have an influence on performance, as well as the risk for injury. For example, an athlete may pass a closed skill test/task such as single-leg landing at the pre-season screening, but still get injured [i.e. ACL injury] as a result of a single-leg landing in a sporting environment such as a competition.

Selecting a Screening Test/Task[edit | edit source]

Factors to consider when selecting a screening test or task include:[13]

  • Nature of activities undertaken in the specific sport
  • Nature of the major injuries in the specific sport [are these linked to specific movements or activities?]
  • Athlete’s injury history [can previous injuries be linked to specific movements or activities?]

Factors Influencing Neuromuscular Control of Movement[edit | edit source]

Various factors can have an impact on an athlete's ability to perform a specific screening test or task. These include:[13]

What is the importance of musculoskeletal assessment?

The musculoskeletal exam helps to identify the functional anatomy associated with clinical conditions, thereby differentiating the underlying system involved and could correctly point towards the condition helping in early diagnosis and intervention.

What is the significance of the health history to the assessment of musculoskeletal health?

Taking an accurate and comprehensive history of a patient's musculoskeletal symptoms is crucial for making the correct diagnosis. This history must include a precise understanding of what the patient means by the description of symptoms.

What is the main assessment technique used for the musculoskeletal system?

The techniques for the assessment of the musculoskeletal system are inspection, palpation, and observing the range of motion of the joints.

What are the 2 techniques used to assess the musculoskeletal system?

To perform an examination of the muscles, bones, and joints, use the classic techniques of inspection, palpation, and manipulation.

Chủ Đề