What is the emotional feelings and associations that go beyond the dictionary definition of a word?
Introduction
1The substantives feeling and emotion have very similar meanings in contemporary English in some of their uses: the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), for instance, defines emotion as “any strong mental or instinctive feeling, as pleasure, grief, hope, fear, etc., deriving esp. from one’s circumstances, mood, or relationship with others” and feeling as “[t]he condition of being emotionally affected or committed; emotion, sentiment; an instance of this, an emotion (of hope, joy, sorrow, etc.)”1. The two lexical items are therefore considered to be synonymous, since they are used to define each other. Show
2This contribution argues that such a view is misleading, and that even when feeling and emotion refer to affects, they are not semantic equivalents, as they designate different types of affects: emotion refers to pre-semantic experience, in the sense that the experience it denotes has not been given a meaning yet, whereas feeling designates categorized affects. To defend this hypothesis, which is backed up by Barrett [2006]’s findings in neuroscience about core affect and emotions, this paper analyzes the collocations formed by the two nouns, and more specifically the sequences ADJECTIVE emotion(s) and ADJECTIVE feeling(s). It focuses on British and American English and is based on data collected from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the British National Corpus (BNC). 3The first section takes stock of the debates about the meaning of the two substantives; the second deals with the collocations formed by emotion and feeling in the singular; the third section presents Barrett’s theory of core affect and emotions and shows its relevance in the study of the meaning of emotion and feeling; the fourth section highlights the connection between the semantic characteristics of the nouns and their semantics. Finally, the fifth and last section offers a few remarks about the plurals feelings and emotions and the adjectives they co-occur with. 1. State of the question1.1. Definitions4The two definitions the OED provides of emotion in its current use (“any strong mental or instinctive feeling, as pleasure, grief, hope, fear, etc., deriving esp. from one’s circumstances, mood, or relationship with others” and “[a]s a mass noun: strong feelings, passion; (more generally) instinctive feeling as distinguished from reasoning or knowledge”) show that according to the dictionary, emotion designates a strong and irrational feeling.
5Feeling is in its turn given definitions quite similar to those of emotion: “The condition of being emotionally affected or committed; emotion, sentiment; an instance of this, an emotion (of hope, joy, sorrow, etc.” – “He’d forgotten the sad gray feeling that had settled on him lately”)2. The circularity of these definitions does not make it easy to grasp the exact meaning of emotion and feeling. 6Feeling has other definitions, some related to sensations (“A physical sensation or perception (as of touch, heat, cold, pain, motion, etc.) experienced through this capacity” – “A lack of potassium in your system can cause feelings of nausea”), to opinions (“An idea, belief, or sense (especially a vague or irrational one) that a particular thing is true; an impression that something is about to happen or is the case; an intuition about something” – “I have a funny feeling you’ll be back”), to talent “A talent or aptitude; an affinity or intuitive understanding” – “He said they had a ‘feeling’ for how materials worked, a feeling for brittleness, strength and workability” or to the effect produced by what is perceived (“The quality or condition which is felt to belong to anything; the general impression or effect produced on a person by an object, a place, another person, etc.” – “This charming West Village spot evokes the feeling of a Parisian bistro à vins”). Feeling has therefore multiple meanings which, as we shall see in Section 2, are often intertwined. 7These definitions leave two questions unanswered: how do emotion and feeling differ when they refer to affects? How are the several meanings of feeling related to one another? As we shall see in the next subsection, the various studies devoted to these issues do not provide very clear answers either. 1.2. Wierzbicka [1999]
8Wierzbicka [1999] points out that several scientific traditions equate emotions with purely physiological reactions in the wake of behaviourism3; the opposite stance, represented by authors such as Solomon [2007], considers them to be judgments and reduce feelings to bodily feelings. Wierzbicka [1999: 2] thinks that emotion has a more complex meaning than feeling:
9She also rejects the view that feeling designates purely bodily feeling: “[…] I do not agree that “feelings” equals “bodily feelings”. For example, if one says that one feels “abandoned”, or “lost”, one is referring to a feeling without referring to anything that happens in the body” (Wierzbicka [1999: 2]), however she does not provide any definition of feeling, as she considers that feel is a semantic prime, which, as such, cannot be broken down into several semantic components. 10Her account underlines the discrepancy between the meaning of the word emotion in common parlance and its use in some scientific fields, and makes it clear that this use is imbued with theoretical biases. However, her own comparison of emotion and feeling remains sketchy. 1.3. Damasio [1994]11Damasio [1994: 139] also opposes emotion and feeling:
12Here again, an emotion is described as consisting of a series of physiological reactions, whereas feelings are reflexive:
13In this view, feelings follow from emotions and are complex representations of both the changes undergone by the body and what causes these changes. Contrary to Wierzbicka’s stance, feelings are seen as more complex than emotions. 14Once again, one may wonder whether these definitions are in keeping with common parlance. 15This brief overview shows that the exact connection between the meanings of feeling and emotion is not straightforward and that scholars do not all designate the same phenomena by means of those words. 16Hilgert [2018: 81], who analyzes the semantics of the French noun émotion, also notes a gap between scientific use and common parlance in French:
The author states that the study of the modifiers of émotion can clarify the meaning of the noun (cf. Hilgert [2018: 81]). The approach adopted here follows the same principle and focuses on adjectives. 2. Study of the adjectives co-occurring with emotion and feeling2.1. Why study adjectives?
17This paper concentrates on adjectives on the grounds set out by Cotte [1997: 68], who explains that “le nom est synthétique, il occulte la complexité du référent”, whereas an adjective “est analytique et il se charge de dévoiler et d’expliciter les qualités contingentes que le nom néglige ou celles qu’il recèle dans sa définition synthétique”5:
Adjectives are therefore likely to shed light on the nature of what is designated by feeling and emotion, and to illustrate how the two nouns differ in their meaning. 2.2. ADJECTIVE emotion
18The substantive emotion occurs 9 919 times in the COCA in its singular form, and there are 639 types of sequences ADJECTIVE emotion; 55 adjectives occur more than 5 times in the corpus in that sequence, as shown in Table 17: Table 1: Adjectives occurring more than 5 times in the sequence ADJECTIVE emotion (COCA)
19In the BNC, which is a smaller corpus than the COCA8, the number of occurrences of emotion (1 464 occurrences in the singular) and of sequences ADJECTIVE emotion is more limited (197 types of sequences); this is why the query includes combinations that occur at least three times (and not five, as was the case with the COCA). One of the advantages of the BNC is to indicate the log-likelihood value of the collocations, and the adjectives are ordered according to that value in Table 2 (as in Table 4, 6 and 8). The query yields 24 adjectives and there is a large overlap between the lexemes found in the two corpora. Table 2: Adjectives occurring at least 3 times in the sequence ADJECTIVE emotion (BNC)
20Several semantic fields can be identified:
21These semantic tendencies reflect the way affects designated by emotion are conceptualized. Intensity adjectives, such as deep, great, strong or powerful, do not give any indication about the nature of what is felt, as shown in the following examples:
22Examples (1) and (2) feature the sequence great emotion, but it does not refer to the same kind of affect in both cases: in (1), the phrase is associated with admiration and sympathy, whereas it is connected with indignation and opposition in (2). In example (3), the speaker underlines that deep emotion can refer to an affect having negative (sorrows) or positive valence (joy). 23Emotion can also refer to an affect that is out of control, as shown by the phrases “barely held in check” and “overwhelmed” in examples (4) and (5):
24As Romero [2004: 451-452] points out, it is possible to distinguish between several categories among intensity adjectives. She notes that:
25However, she observes that there is a thin line between descriptive adjectives and intensity adjectives:
26She differentiates between pure intensity adjectives, which are directly intensive:
and descriptive adjectives that refer to intensity indirectly:
27Among the intensity adjectives modifying emotion, strong, intense, powerful or extreme seem to be direct intensifiers, whereas raw, for instance, is also descriptive: the idea that the affect has not been polished, refined or channelled implies that the emotion described is strong; one may therefore conclude that it is in the very nature of an emotion to be strong, hence the hypothesis, formulated by Kövecses [2000: xiv], that emotions are essentially conceptualized as forces: “the key theme in our folk theoretical thinking about emotions” is “the idea that we view emotions as forces that turn a ‘rational’ self into an ‘irrational’ one”; he also identifies “a single master metaphor (namely, the metaphor EMOTIONS ARE FORCES) that organizes much of our thinking about emotion. 28As mentioned earlier, several frequent adjectives related to emotion – evident, genuine, honest, outward, pent-up, real, sincere or suppressed – refer to how and whether an emotion is manifested. It is possible to divide that category into two: some of those lexemes refer to whether or not the emotion is visible or expressed (evident, outward, pent-up, suppressed) and others to the equation between the affect displayed and what is actually felt by the experiencer (genuine, honest, real, sincere):
29The semantics of these adjectives, as well as the meaning of the utterances (“he showed no sign of outward emotion”, “His face was white with suppressed emotion”) show that an emotion is conceived of as a phenomenon that is intrinsically visible or has outward manifestations: its “release” (cf. example (7)) goes hand in hand with its becoming visible, which is in keeping with the etymology of the word16. Consequently, what is shown can correspond to what is felt by the experiencer or not, hence the use of adjectives such as actual, genuine, honest, real or sincere:
30The examples show that those adjectives are very similar to the previous subcategory mentioned: in examples (8) and (9), the emotion is considered to be genuine or sincere because it is visible. 31Category B adjectives thus suggest that emotions are intrinsically visible, even when the experiencer tries to hide or control them (cf. pent-up and suppressed). 32Category C consists of classifying adjectives, some of which have to do with the very nature of the emotion characterized (aesthetic, moral, religious) and others with its valence (negative, positive):
33Category C is therefore made up of adjectives that leave the particular feel of the affect opaque: adjectives referring to its valence divide the experience into very broad categories, whereas those linked with the field it belongs to (aesthetic, moral, religious) do not give any indication about the actual experience of the emotion.
34This overview of the attributive adjectives modifying emotion highlights the fact that the affects designated by emotion remain opaque, which is in keeping with the use of emotion as a mass noun in the majority of the utterances quoted above: if emotion refers to a powerful, shapeless phenomenon, it is reminiscent of the definition given by Langacker [1990: 69] of a mass noun, which “designates a region that is NOT specifically bounded within the scope of predication in its primary domain”17. As we shall see in the next subsection, the adjectives modifying feeling form a different pattern. 2.3. ADJECTIVE feeling2.3.1. Semantic categories35The substantive feeling is more frequent than emotion in the COCA (35 485 occurrences in the corpus) and there are over 1 800 types of sequences ADJECTIVE feeling; the 97 adjectives occurring more than 15 times in the corpus are indicated in Table 3: Table 3: Adjectives occurring in the sequence ADJECTIVE feeling (COCA)
36In the BNC, the noun feeling occurs 6 966 times, and there are 674 types of sequences ADJECTIVE feeling; the attributive adjectives modifying feeling occurring at least 10 times are the following: Table 4: Adjectives occurring in the sequence ADJECTIVE feeling (BNC)
37Not all the occurrences are relevant, since feeling is polysemous, so that some of those sequences have a meaning differing from the meaning under study in this paper18, and the figures in brackets are merely illustrative19. 38Here again, the adjectives fall into several semantic categories:
39It is noticeable that the role of the adjectives varies with the meaning and the syntax of feeling in each utterance: when feeling admits a prepositional phrase or a clause as a complement the adjectives tend to be evaluative or descriptive (15, for instance). Moreover, the sequences ADJECTIVEfeeling are compatible with the various meanings of feeling, be it that relating to a sensation (17), an affect (13) or an opinion (16). In (18), for instance, the complement clause that being mean to the dolls had caused their father’s illness identifies the cognitive content of the feeling, whereas the adjective sick identifies the nature of the affect. 2.3.2. Category F40This subsection is about category F adjectives, characterizing the nature of the feeling: they often seem to be evaluative or descriptive, such as queasy, sick or warm. However, unlike typical evaluative and descriptive adjectives, they cannot be used predicatively:
41The questionable grammaticality of (17’) and (19’) suggests that those adjectives are to some extent categorizing adjectives in the sense that they refer to a type of affect. Their use sometimes constitutes a hypallage since it is the experiencer himself or herself who is characterized by the adjective:
This issue will further be dealt with in Section 4.2.3. 2.4. Summary42The adjectives co-occurring with feeling are more varied than those modifying emotion, which, on the one hand, results from the polysemy of feeling, and, on the other hand, from the fact that feeling does not designate the same type of affects as emotion, as the next section aims to demonstrate. 3. Core affect and emotions43The analysis of what Barrett [2006: 30-31] names “core affect” offers an interesting insight into the distinction between the nouns emotion and feeling:
44As the “basic building block of emotional life”, core affect is the basis for emotions20:
45Barrett’s research leads her to conclude that what she calls “emotions” results from categorization:
46Core affect is characterized by its binary value21, whereas emotions result from a more complex cognitive treatment and emerge as a consequence of core affect:
47What Barrett [2006: 35] calls “emotions” are therefore:
The dichotomy identified by Barrett seems to find an echo in the ways the substantives emotion and feeling function. As we have seen above, emotion is compatible with a restricted range of adjectives denoting mainly strength, and whether the affect is expressed or not. In that sense, emotion refers to an experience that is not semanticized, since it has not yet been given a meaning and results from a basic cognitive analysis. On the other hand, feeling is modified by adjectives that describe the nature of the experience undergone by the human subject; as Barrett highlights, it is the result of an operation of categorization and is both “affective and conceptual”. In other words, the noun emotion seems to designate what Barrett names “core affect” and the noun feeling what she calls “emotion”. 48This hypothesis is backed up by the non-count use of emotion, redolent of “the ongoing, ever-changing” character of core affect, as opposed to the “separate” nature of feeling, which is mainly used as a count noun. 49Finally, the “affective and conceptual” nature of what Barrett calls “emotion” is reminiscent of the polysemy of feeling, which can designate affects and opinions, and often mixes those two dimensions, as illustrated by the structure ADJECTIVE feeling of + NP or ADJECTIVE feeling + complement clause. These features of emotion and feeling all suggest that the latter refers to an experience imbued with meaning, whereas the former designates pre-semantic experience. The object of the next section is to show that these characteristics are connected with the etymology and the morphology of the two nouns. 4. Etymology and morphology4.1. Emotion
50The OEDnotes that emotion, borrowed from French, was first used in English at the end of the 16th century to refer to “Political agitation, civil unrest; a public commotion or uprising” (the first recorded example of that meaning22 dates back to 1562) and “Movement; disturbance, perturbation; an instance of this” (the first example23 is from 1594). 51Later on, in the 17th century, Thorley [2013: 5] notes that emotion:
52He also states that:
53Thorley [2013: 15] considers that the next step leading to the contemporary use of the word is exemplified by a phrase coined by Jeremy Taylor, ‘the emotions of an unquiet conscience’:
To summarize, “emotion during the seventeenth century [...] had taken the early steps of the long evolutionary journey that would distance it from the physical, fixing it more commonly in the mental realm” [Thorley 2013: 15]. 54The substantive emotion is therefore etymologically and historically connected with the idea of movement and agitation: it first designated an event that leads to a change of situation before stability is reached. There seem to be remnants of that origin in the contemporary use of emotion, as the idea of disturbance, of change in the making is in keeping with the “core affect” postulated by Barrett and with the idea that emotion refers to an affective experience whose cognitive treatment remains to be completed. 4.2. Feeling55As we saw in the previous sections, feeling refers to different types of affects, which this section argues is connected with its being derived from the verb feel. 4.2.1. Feeling and analysis
56We saw in Section 2 that the meanings of feeling are related to perception, affect and cognition, as is the verb feel. Paulin [2003: 131] explains that when the verb refers to affects, “nous considérerons qu’il y a une relation d’altérité non stricte de perception de soi par soi-même. Le sujet perçoit ce qui n’est autre chose que lui-même, comme le même et un autre que lui.”24 The experiencer is therefore split into two entities, the subject of the affect and the observer of that subject. In other words, feel encodes the distance taken by the experiencer from his or her own experience, which allows him or her to give it meaning and to categorize it. This property of feel can be found in the substantive feeling: the categorization involved explains the three semantic dimensions of feel and feeling – perception, affect and cognition –, since affect is here a form of self-perception which involves cognitive categorization. It also accounts for the fact that several semantic components can often be detected in occurrences of feeling. 4.2.2. -ing57Feeling is a particular case of -ing derivation; indeed, according to Quirk et al. [1985] the nominal suffix -ing corresponds to the following cases:
58Feeling does not belong to any of these categories: it is generally used as a count noun and therefore deviates from the two groups identified in the first quote; it does not refer to the result of an action or to an event either, and therefore differs from the third group. Although it is a fully-fledged noun – as opposed to a gerund or a gerundial noun – it maintains a strong connection with the inflectional suffix, as it refers to the very actualization of the situation denoted by feel, and it has no other reality than that actualization for the experiencer. 59The inflectional prefix nominalizes the verb:
60This paper argues that the derivational suffix found in the substantive feeling is anaphoric, like the inflectional suffix, and keeps a connection with an underlying predicative relation. The role of -ing is here both to establish a link with the actualization of a predicative relation and to present the result of that actualization as an autonomous entity, since it is designated by a substantive:
The next subsection aims to show that this is why some of the adjectives modifying feeling form hypallages. 4.2.3. Feeling and hypallage61As observed in Section 2.3.2, hypallages can be found in the following utterances:
62As said above, the adjective denotes the nature of the affect experienced. Furthermore, Cotte [1991] observes that the adjective category is related to preconstruction:
Consequently, the hypallage (what the author calls “fausse attribution”) completes the operation consisting in presenting the affect as an autonomous entity, independent from the experiencer. In that sense, the emergence of hypallages is in keeping with the -ing form; the substantive feeling is the result of the situation it is connected with, and the hypallage shows that the feeling cannot be dissociated from the experiencer’s state; at the same time, the nominal status of feeling imbues it with an autonomous existence. 63Those adjectives highlight the paradoxical nature of what feeling designates: the affect emanates from the experiencer, however, as a noun, feeling separates the affect from a singular experience. 4.3. Summary64The etymological and morphological characteristics of emotion and feeling reflect their semantic singularities: the contemporary meaning of emotion as pre-semantic affect echoes its historical connection with the idea of agitation and disturbance; moreover, the nominalization of the verb yielding feeling accounts for its polysemy, its denoting semanticized affects and the hypallages it forms. 5. Emotions and feelings: a few remarks65In their plural form, emotion and feeling do not co-occur with the same adjectives as in the singular. 5.1. Definitions
66The OED offers several definitions specific to the plural feelings28:
67The plural occurs when multiple feelings are referred to, either concerning one individual, as in the first definition, or several experiencers (cf. definition 3). More surprisingly, the second definition designates a specific type of affect. 5.2. Collocations5.2.1. Emotions
68Table 5 lists the 73 adjectives occurring more than five times with the plural form emotions in the COCA and Table 6 the 42 adjectives occurring more than three times in the BNC29: Table 5: Adjectives occurring more than 5 times in the sequence ADJECTIVE emotions (COCA)
Table 6: Adjectives occurring more than 3 times in the sequence ADJECTIVE emotions (BNC)
69Some of these adjectives are similar to the adjectives co-occurring with the singular form emotion and some are related to the intensity of the affect (deep, extreme, great, intense, overwhelming, powerful, raw, strong, violent). However, overall, the semantic groups tend to differ widely from those occurring with the singular; only few adjectives are related to whether or not the affect is manifested, and that category is restricted to pent-up and suppressed here.
70On the other hand, other sub-groups emerge: the adjectives dark(er), destructive, negative, positive, uncomfortable are related to the actual experience of the affect and to its valence30. 71Finally, several adjectives denote complexity or contradiction: complex, conflicting, contradictory, mixed, turbulent and some of them are among the most frequent adjectives with the form emotions (mixed and conflicting). As observed in Section 3, emotion in the singular tends to appear as a non-count noun, which is obviously not the case in the plural; however, the adjectives referring to complexity suggest that the affects described are lumped together and cannot easily be disentangled:
5.2.3. Feelings
72Table 7 lists the 70 adjectives occurring more than five times with the plural form emotions in the COCA and Table 8 the 56 adjectives occurring more than five times in the BNC31: Table 7: Adjectives occurring more than 5 times in the sequence ADJECTIVE feelings (COCA)
Table 8: Adjectives occurring more than 5 times in the sequence ADJECTIVE feelings (BNC)
73Among the adjectives common to the two lists, some of the semantic groups that can be identified are similar to those found with the singular feeling: adjectives related to intensity (deep, intense, strong), valence (good, negative, painful, positive, uncomfortable), authenticity (real, true) and classifying adjectives (emotional, religious, sexual). Adjectives occurring with the plural feelings differ from those forming collocations with the singular on three accounts: as is the case with emotions, one subgroup is related to heterogeneity (ambivalent, conflicting, mixed); one subgroup is specific: bad feelings, hard feelings and tender feelings refer to social affects; finally, one can also identify adjectives referring to one individual’s affects (personal, private and subjective):
74Bad feelings designates affects caused by other people’s behaviour which are in that sense social affects. Social affects are overrepresented with the plural feelings whereas the adjectives found with feeling in the singular and connected with the nature of the experience (sick, sinking, etc.) are not common with the plural32. Moreover, phrases such as ambivalent feelings, conflictingfeelings or mixed feelings often designate opinions rather than pure affects:
75As we saw in Section 4, the noun feeling results from the nominalization of a predicative relation based on the verb feel; in its plural form, feeling is more clearly grounded in the paradigms of prototypical nouns, and is therefore at a further remove from the verb and the predicative relation, so that the referent is not envisaged as the direct product of the experiencer’s affective and cognitive activity. This seems to go hand in hand with the fact that the plural, unlike the singular, does not focus on the actual experience of the affect, but either on social entities circulating between individuals or on opinions, encompassing several components. 76In that sense, the plural has two different effects on the semantics of emotion and feeling: with emotions, it is connected with confusion, whereas with feelings, it has to do with the addition of separate entities. Conclusion77Although emotion and feeling both refer to affects and are considered to be synonymous in some of their uses, a closer analysis of the collocations they form with adjectives shows that they refer to different kinds of affects, as emotion denotes affective experiences that have not been categorized, whereas feeling refers to affects that have undergone a more elaborate cognitive treatment. Those characteristics are correlated with the etymology and morphology of those words, but also with the experience of affect as described by cognitive neuroscience. Finally, the plural forms emotions and feelings form specific collocations, which reflects a social and intellectual conception of affects, further removed from individual experience. What includes the emotions and feelings associated with a word?Connotation is the emotional and imaginative association surrounding a word.
What is the emotional association of a word?Connotation is the emotional meaning of a word, or at least the emotional associations it carries within a particular culture. Though two words could have similar literal meanings, they could have drastically different impacts on what a sentence means to a reader.
Is the dictionary definition of a word is the feeling or idea associated with a word?Page 2. Denotation: The dictionary definition; a word's literal meaning only. Not emotions or feelings are associated with the word.
What is it called when one word has more than one definition?When words are spelled the same and sound the same but have different meanings, then they are called homonyms.
|