So sánh gtx 660 và gt 730 năm 2024

In short — GeForce GTX 660 outperforms GeForce GT 730 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 660 is 650 days older than GeForce GT 730.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

  • Consumes up to 65% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 - 49 vs 140 Watts

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

  • Performs up to 25% better in F1 22 than GeForce GT 730 - 50 vs 40 FPS
  • Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 - 2 vs 1 GB

This is a free version of F1 22.

F1 22

ZOTAC GeForce GT 730 Zone Edition 4GB DDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 (x8 lanes) Graphics Card (ZT-71115-20L)

Updated 110 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Theoretical Performance

NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Jun 18th, 2014

Release DateSep 6th, 2012GeForce 700GenerationGeForce 600Not AvailableMSRP$2291x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAOutputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNonePower Connectors1x 6-pin

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

1 GBMemory

2 GB

DDR3TypeGDDR5128-bitBus192-bit28.8 GB/sBandwidth

144.2 GB/s

700 MHzBase Clock Speed

980 MHz

Not AvailableBoost Clock Speed1032 MHz900 MHzMemory Clock Speed

1502 MHz

Builds Using GeForce GT 730 or GeForce GTX 660

F1 22, 1920 x 1080, Ultra High

GeForce GT 730

Ryzen 5 3600

8 GB, 240 GB SSD

GeForce GT 730

Ryzen 5 3600

8 GB, 240 GB SSD

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Tên GPU GF108 GK104 Phiên bản GPU GF108-400-A1 GK104-300-KD-A2 Kiến trúc Fermi Kepler Nhà sản xuất TSMC TSMC Kích thước tiến trình 40 nm 28 nm Bóng bán dẫn 585 million 3,540 million Kích thước chết 116 mm² 294 mm²

Card đồ hoạ

Ngày phát hành Jun 18th, 2014 Aug 16th, 2012 Thế hệ GeForce 700 GeForce 600 Sản xuất End-of-life End-of-life Giao diện Bus PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Tiền nhiệm GeForce 600 GeForce 500 Kế vị GeForce 900 GeForce 700 Giá ra mắt — 299 USD Đánh giá — 83 in our database

Tốc độ xung nhịp

Xung nhịp GPU 700 MHz — Xung nhịp đổ bóng 1400 MHz — xung nhịp bộ nhớ 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective 1502 MHz 6 Gbps effective Xung nhịp cơ bản — 915 MHz Tăng xung nhịp — 980 MHz

Kích thước bộ nhớ 2 GB 2 GB Loại bộ nhớ DDR3 GDDR5 Bộ nhớ Bus 128 bit 192 bit Băng thông 25.60 GB/s 144.2 GB/s

cấu hình kết xuất

Các đơn vị bóng 96 1344 Đơn vị xử lý bề mặt 16 112 ROPs 4 24 Số lượng SM 2 — Bộ nhớ đệm L1 64 KB (per SM) 16 KB (per SMX) Bộ nhớ đệm L2 256 KB 384 KB Số lượng SMX — 7

Hiệu năng lý thuyết

Tỷ lệ điểm ảnh 2.800 GPixel/s 27.44 GPixel/s Tốc độ làm đầy vật liệu 11.20 GTexel/s 109.8 GTexel/s FP32 (float) hiệu năng 268.8 GFLOPS 2.634 TFLOPS FP64 (double) hiệu năng 22.40 GFLOPS (1:12) 109.8 GFLOPS (1:24)

Thiết kế bảng mạch

Chiều rộng khe Single-slot Dual-slot Chiều dài 145 mm 5.7 inches 241 mm 9.5 inches Công suất thiết kế 49 W 150 W Bộ nguồn khuyến nghị 200 W 450 W Đầu ra 1x DVI1x HDMI1x VGA 2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort Đầu nối nguồn None 2x 6-pin Số bảng mạch P1070, P1071 P2004

Tính năng đồ hoạ

DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0) OpenGL 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 1.1 3.0 Vulkan — 1.1 CUDA 2.1 3.0 Mô hình đổ bóng 5.1 5.1

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96096CUDA cores960no dataCore clock speed980 MHz700 MHzBoost clock speed1033 MHzno dataNumber of transistors2,540 million585 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm40 nmPower consumption (TDP)140 Watt49 WattTexture fill rate78.4 billion/sec11.2 GT/sFloating-point performance1,981 gflops268.8 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16Length9.5" (24.1 cm)145 mmHeight4.376" (11.1 cm)no dataWidth2-slot1-slotSupplementary power connectorsOne 6-pinNoneSLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GBMemory bus width192-bit GDDR5128 BitMemory clock speed6.0 GB/s1800 MHzMemory bandwidth144.2 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAMulti monitor support4 displaysno dataHDMI++HDCP+no dataMaximum VGA resolution2048x1536no dataAudio input for HDMIInternalno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data3D Gaming+no data3D Vision+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.34.6OpenCL1.21.1Vulkan1.1.126N/ACUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660 outperforms GT 730 by 380% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 660 outperforms GT 730 by 380% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 660 outperforms GT 730 by 331% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 660 outperforms GT 730 by 286% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 660 outperforms GT 730 by 214% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 660 outperforms GT 730 by 220% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 660 outperforms GT 730 by 230% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47 9−10

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 10.32 2.15 Recency 6 September 2012 18 June 2014 Cost $229 $59.99 Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 49 Watt

The GeForce GTX 660 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


GeForce GTX 660

GeForce GT 730

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

So sánh gtx 660 và gt 730 năm 2024

So sánh gtx 660 và gt 730 năm 2024

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

So sánh gtx 660 và gt 730 năm 2024

So sánh gtx 660 và gt 730 năm 2024

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.