Đánh giá meike 12mm f2 8
|
X Mount : X-T3 X-T100 X-Pro2 X-E3 X-T1 X-T2 X-T10 X-T20 X-A2 X-E2 X-E1 X30 X70 X-M1 XPro1,X-T4, X-T5，X-H2S,etc. Show E Mount: A7III A9 NEX 3 3N 5 NEX 5T NEX 5R NEX 6 7 A5000 A5100 A6000 A6100 A6300 A6500 ,etc. Canon EFM-mount : such as: EOS M M2 M3 M5 etc. M43 / MFT Mount: Olympus mirrorless camera E-P1 E-PL1 E-P2 E-PL2 E-P3 E-PL3 E-PL5 E-PM1 E-PM2 OM-D E-M5 E-P5 OM-D E-M1 OMD-EM10,etc. Olympus Micro 4/3 cameras Panasonic Lumix G9 G1 G2 G3 G5 GF1 GF2 GF3 GF5 GF6 GF7 GH1 GH2 GH3 GH5 G6 GX1 GX7 GX8 GH4 GM1 GM5 -D E-M5 E-P5 OM-D E-M1 OMD-EM10 and other Panasonic Lumix Micro M4/3 MFT cameras etc. Description:With its large aperture opening up to F2.8, it has a high light intensity and allows precise recording even in poor light conditions. The lens is multi-layered, its body made of metal is high-quality processed and can be adjusted comfortably and easily. It is wide angle lens,suitable for both Astrophotography, Landscape and Architectural Photography. Please kindly note the manual focus lens can't be recogniced by camera unless coming with the camera setting "release without lens" The equivalent focal length is around 18mm.
Specifications:
Smaple ImagesWith a wide aperture of f/2.8, the lens can deliver a beautiful bokeh, and the subject remains sharp. Sorry, we just need to make sure you're not a robot. For best results, please make sure your browser is accepting cookies. Type the characters you see in this image:Try different image Conditions of Use Privacy Policy © 1996-2014, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? Mar 5, 2018 Ready to pull the trigger...if anyone has samples that would be much appreciated Thanks Rick Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? In reply to Bejersey • Mar 5, 2018 1 Bejersey wrote: Don't have this lens but have you considered Samyang/Rokinon 12mm f/2.0. It is slightly more expensive but it is faster at f/2.0 instead f/2.8. Olympus E-M1 II Olympus E-M1 III Olympus Zuiko Digital 35mm 1:3.5 Macro Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm 1:2.8-3.5 SWD Sigma 70mm F2.8 EX DG Macro +14 more OP Bejersey • Forum Pro • Posts: 15,607 Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? Space the final frontier wrote:Bejersey wrote:Don't have this lens but have you considered Samyang/Rokinon 12mm f/2.0. It is slightly more expensive but it is faster at f/2.0 instead f/2.8. I don't have the money...so needing to go on the cheap. Thank you for your response! Rick Lichtspiel • Veteran Member • Posts: 3,664 Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? In reply to Bejersey • Mar 5, 2018 Bejersey wrote: Not that this will be helpful, but I just returned a 6.5mm Meike fisheye lens. It wasn't bad optically, and perfectly capable of funky images. But it had its infinity setting smack in the middle of the range, at the 1ft mark (lol). And even though it was very compact, it was also very heavy. Just do some testing... QA is probably not Meike's strong side. Sony a7CR Voigtlander 15mm F4.5 Super Wide Heliar Sony FE 20mm F1.8G Samyang AF 35mm F1.8 FE Tamron 70-300 F4.5-6.3 Di RXD III +6 more Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? Lichtspiel wrote:Bejersey wrote: Mine is fine - very well built, as is my Meike 35/1.7 (real bargain). The big issue with the 6.5mm is that it is full circular fish eye on aps-c which has “the look” whilst because it is aps-c re-mounted for M4/3 the image circle gets cropped. Which is not bad but it is nicest with full circle - so I have adapted it to Sony E (yes it can be done) and use it on my NEX6 where it captures a pleasant full circle image. Sorry can’t help with the 12/2.8 but Meike quality/value seems quite good in my opinion. -- hide signature -- Tom Caldwell OP Bejersey • Forum Pro • Posts: 15,607 Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? ReCaptcha • Regular Member • Posts: 332 Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? In reply to Bejersey • Mar 6, 2018 1 Bejersey wrote: ePHOTOzine reviewed it on a Panasonic G6... one of the few reviews with the lens on mFT. https://www.ephotozine.com/article/meike-12mm-f-2-8-lens-review-30051EPh Samples look nice. Distortion well controlled. Flare is a little high. Interesting lens. I have 3 zooms that hit twelve (12-32, 12-40, and 12-45), so I'm using that fact to avoid G.A.S. here as the distortion control does look nice. YI M1 Panasonic GX850 Fujifilm X-E3 Fujifilm X-A5 Fujifilm X-T100 +35 more Lichtspiel • Veteran Member • Posts: 3,664 Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? ReCaptcha wrote:Bejersey wrote: From the review: Looking at flare, we immediately hit a significant weakness. Even the slightest hint of a light source such as the sun at the edge of the frame simply wipes out the image. Provided the light is watched and against the light shots are avoided or handled by standing in shade then contrast is very good, but the merest hint of strong light on the lens and the image disappears in a haze of purple. That could be a bit of a drawback. Running into this to some degree with my Rokinon 12/2 as well, especially indoors. Sony a7CR Voigtlander 15mm F4.5 Super Wide Heliar Sony FE 20mm F1.8G Samyang AF 35mm F1.8 FE Tamron 70-300 F4.5-6.3 Di RXD III +6 more Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? 2 Lichtspiel wrote:ReCaptcha wrote:Bejersey wrote: Just as a side issue the Olympus 12/2.0 has to rely on software corection to get its results and it is an expensive lens - if Meike can get there on lens design alone without software help than some tendency to flare can be excused at its more affordable price. -- hide signature -- Tom Caldwell WhiteBeard • Senior Member • Posts: 2,944 Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? In reply to Bejersey • Mar 7, 2018 1 Bejersey wrote: Sorry but 12 mm is not UWA for µ4/3 in my book. It's a nice wide-angle, equivalent (the E word) to 24mm. UWA is anything 9-ish and below in µ4/3 (18mm or less in 35mm FF equivalent). The Laowa 7.5mm F2 is a true UWA as are the various 7-14, 8-18 and 9-18mm zooms available from Panasonic and Olympus. Now, realizing the Meike is primarily an E-Mount APS-C lens, it would act as an 18mm (35mm Eq) lens on an APS-C camera hence would cut it for UWA on such a body but not on a µ4/3 one... Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH Panasonic Lumix G Vario 45-200mm F4-5.6 OIS +4 more OP Bejersey • Forum Pro • Posts: 15,607 Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? PC UK • Regular Member • Posts: 135 Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? WhiteBeard wrote:Bejersey wrote: Sadly - this Meike 12mm f/2.8 is a lens that has no stand out feature for an amateur M4/3 user. It is only 1 stop brighter than the kit 14-42 lenses for micro 4/3 - but these come with AF and OIS (panasonic) as well as signalling to the camera body for in-camera corrections or exif data to trigger automatic corrections in programmes such as DXO Pro. Both the Panasonic and Olympus kit zooms have amazing image quality in the 14-35mm range, and only drop a little up to full 42mm. At 12mm wide this lens is only a little wider than the 14-42mm kit lenses and reviews suggests that this is not as wide as other 12mm.........so perhaps nearer 14mm? So what do I want instead? Easy answer - something that makes a visible photographic difference over the kit lens. A rectilinear 18-20mm full-frame equivalent would be ideal (9-10mm in micro 4/3 terms) - but at a price that Meike and 7-artisans should be able to deliver (ie way cheaper than the $500 Laowa M4/3 ultrawide) . It doesn't have to be optically perfect - I accept that no one can make these at top image quality without very expensive high density, aspheric glass lens elements - the idea is to get the ultrawide perspective at a price amateurs can afford. Vivitar and Sigma understood that back in the days of 35mm film SLRs. For now, I am using the excellent 7-artisans F2.8 fisheye with native M4/3 mount and defishing easily with DXO-Pro. Yes....sure the Olympus Pro model fisheye is optically better, but not by THAT much to justify the dramatic difference in a price over the 7-artisans. And that 7-Artisans is priced just ahead of the F8 Olympus "body cap" "pinhole style" fisheye. Until then - I am waiting before buying (Meike, are you listening?) Best wishes - Paul C Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? In reply to PC UK • Apr 22, 2019 Samyang 12mm and 7artisans 7.5 are both excellent if not great lenses, especially at those prices. The problem with matured companies in a matured market is that they have more liabilities, higher pay workforce and generally less agile response. They cannot afford to make less expensive products because of narrow profit margins. Sigma is doing exceptionally well in this environment imo. Olympus E-M1 II Olympus E-M1 III Olympus Zuiko Digital 35mm 1:3.5 Macro Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm 1:2.8-3.5 SWD Sigma 70mm F2.8 EX DG Macro +14 more SFfPhoto • Regular Member • Posts: 204 Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? In reply to Bejersey • Apr 24, 2019 Hey Rick As someone mentioned, the 12mm Chinese/Korean lenses are for larger formats and hence big and heavy. PLUS None will be as nice to use as a 12/2 Oly (under $400 if you shop around). Not only AF and full electronics but also has a hyperfocal shooting manual mode. PLUS If you later decide you should have purchased a 9-18mm you can sell the 12/2 for the price you paid. Doubtful with one of the Chinese/Korean lenses. Andersonm • Senior Member • Posts: 1,121 Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? In reply to SFfPhoto • Apr 24, 2019 Yes, the 12mm f2 isn't "great and dirt cheap" like the 45mm 1.8, it's just "great". But you get sharpness, light and compact size, autofocus, good build. Very much quality of life factors. Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm 1:2 Panasonic 20mm F1.7 II Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH SFfPhoto • Regular Member • Posts: 204 Re: Anyone happy with there Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Lens? In reply to Bejersey • Apr 24, 2019 Rick- Add'l info on inexpensive 12mm lenses. The fellow here: https://sonyalpha.blog/ has reviewed the Rok 12/2, 7Artisans 12/2.8 & Meike 12/2.8 The Rok comes out on top the Meike last. I like the fact that the 7Art has a DOF scale like the Oly 12/2, the others (judging by the photos) do not. HOWEVER the 7Art has no detents for the f-stops if you care. Build quality is impressive. I believe it is the smallest of the 3, but it is heavy (11.5 oz vs. 4.5 for Oly) and actual focal length is +/-12.8mm (not a true 12mm) Keyboard shortcuts: FForum MMy threads You may also likeLatest sample galleriesLatest in-depth reviewsWith a bigger battery and better video capabilities, the Fujifilm X-S20 could be the vlogging machine content creators have been waiting for. The Sony a7CR is a high-resolution addition to the company's compact full-frame a7C series. So what did we make of it and where does it leave the a7 IV that it sits just above? Lomography's LomoChrome '92 is designed to mimic the look of classic drugstore film that used to fill family photo albums. As we discovered, to shoot with it is to embrace the unexpected, from strange color shifts to odd textures and oversized grain. The LowePro PhotoSport Outdoor is a camera pack for photographers who also need a well-designed daypack for hiking and other outdoor use. If that sounds like you, the PhotoSport Outdoor may be a great choice, but as with any hybrid product, there are a few tradeoffs. The Sony a7C II refreshes the compact full-frame with a 33MP sensor, the addition of a front control dial, a dedicated 'AI' processor, 10-bit 4K/60p video and more. It's a definite improvement, but it helps if you value its compact form. Latest buying guidesIf you want a compact camera that produces great quality photos without the hassle of changing lenses, there are plenty of choices available for every budget. Read on to find out which portable enthusiast compacts are our favorites. What's the best camera for travel? Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best. 'What's the best mirrorless camera?' We're glad you asked. What’s the best camera for around $2000? This price point gives you access to some of the most all-round capable cameras available. Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus and great looking video are the least you can expect. We've picked the models that really stand out. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. |
